A key stat highlighting Chelsea's loss against Manchester City was their performance in the final third. Chelsea struggled with execution and finishing, which was a major difference compared to City's effectiveness in that area

 One key stat highlighting where Chelsea fell short against Manchester City, aside from the goals, is their lack of efficiency in the final third. Chelsea struggled to convert their chances into goals, while Manchester City demonstrated superior finishing and composure in crucial moments.

Chelsea lost 2-0 to Manchester City in their Premier League opener at Stamford Bridge. The match was always going to be challenging for Chelsea and their new head coach, Enzo Maresca.

Sources reveal that Chelsea are keeping an eye on four strikers this month, aiming to bring in one before the transfer window closes. While a win against Manchester City might have been optimistic, many hoped for a draw against the reigning champions. However, Pep Guardiola’s side proved too strong, securing a 2-0 victory and a clean sheet away from home in their opening game of the new season.


Football often involves out-running opponents as well as out-scoring them, and in their 2-0 defeat to Manchester City, Chelsea were outpaced. City covered 111.4 km compared to Chelsea’s 107.6 km. Last season, Chelsea were outrun in 32 of their 38 Premier League matches, indicating a recurring issue. Distance covered is crucial, and it’s an area Enzo Maresca may need to address in training to improve his team's ground coverage. Ultimately, though, being clinical in front of goal remains the most important factor, and Chelsea fell short in that aspect on Sunday.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post